Gigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 06:20
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 44.8
32% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 45.1
8-Core 45.8
6% 45.4 Pts
64-Core 45.3
3% 45.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 1.1
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 189 184 189 180 183 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.7% Average
Read 189
Write 113
Mixed 178
SusWrite 187
38% 166 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 23.2
72% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 65.8
DQ Mixed 35.8
30% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 100%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
113GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 18 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 17.1
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 16.9
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.3
124% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.A2GC9.9L00C 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.9
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-J1800N-D2H Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback