Synnex HYVE-ZEUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSynnex HYVE-ZEUS  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRD-iF
Memory27.6 GB free of 32.0156 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 04:00
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 181
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 518
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 893
55% 893 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1616 MHz, MLim: 1747 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 41
Parallax 33.2
30% 36.9 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 31.2
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 436 433 445 458 460 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 448
Mixed 414
SusWrite 443
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 47
148% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 259
208% 292 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 105%
Great: 128%
ST1000DM 003-1SB102 1TB
125GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 13.4
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 26.6
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 Micron/Numonyx 25Q Series 32GB
1600, 1600, 33 MHz
16384, 16384, 16 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HYVE-ZEUS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Synnex HYVE-ZEUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback