Synnex HYVE-ZEUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSynnex HYVE-ZEUS  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRD-iF
Memory27.3 GB free of 32.0156 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 04:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 178
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 476
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 29.4
26% 32.6 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 27.2
25% 31 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 427 431 431 433 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 436
Mixed 416
SusWrite 433
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 41.8
133% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 257
207% 291 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 128%
ST1000DM 003-1SB102 1TB
126GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 25.1
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 26.2
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 Micron/Numonyx 25Q Series 32GB
1600, 1600, 33 MHz
16384, 16384, 16 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HYVE-ZEUS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Synnex HYVE-ZEUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback