Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 176 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 575 56% 462 Pts	64-Core 892 55% 892 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.8% Poor	Lighting 32.1 Reflection 36.4 Parallax 29.3 26% 32.6 fps	MRender 35.1 Gravity 30.8 Splatting 27.3 25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB 6,756 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 453 458 461 465 466 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 470 Mixed 430 SusWrite 456 104% 462 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 46.6 154% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 258 209% 295 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 128%
ST1000DM 003-1SB102 1TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 126GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 15.7 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 27.7 32% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 Micron/Numonyx 25Q Series 32GB 1600, 1600, 33 MHz 16384, 16384, 16 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.4% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.7 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 01stBench 68%, 1,437 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	1x

SSD
SKC600256G 256GBKingstonBench 102%, 6,756 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 Micron/Numonyx 25Q Series 32GBSamsungBench 30%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $100