TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 580-023w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 580-023w  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateMay 05 '22 at 20:02
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 199
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 257
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 62.2%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.3% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 59.2
51% 62.2 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 59.2
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 51.3%
 Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 391 392 408 410 361 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 404
Mixed 395
SusWrite 386
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 46.5
151% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 302
243% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 859B CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 32GB
2400, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 76.1%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 580-023w Builds (Compare 879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: HP 580-023w

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples821x
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples33x
Core i7-7700KIntel  $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples8x
GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples678x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples15x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples14x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples34x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples31x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples25x
RAM
HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 66%, 5,828 samples163x
4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 2x4GBMicronBench 63%, 3,242 samples72x
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples70x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback