Citon Q SERIES

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Citon Q SERIES (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ57TM
Memory	4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '22 at 06:39
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 135 60% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 330 36% 287 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% PNY(196E 1380) 2GB CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Lighting 23.2 Reflection 20.8 Parallax 23.6 19% 22.5 fps	MRender 28.8 Gravity 25.5 Splatting 19 19% 24.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 300GB-$289 2,154 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 168 181 171 176 174 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 203 Write 182 Mixed 148 SusWrite 168 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 16.2 51% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 17.2 DQ Write 36.9 DQ Mixed 15.4 15% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 54%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 204GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 89 89 89 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 71.9 Write 78.3 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 88.2 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 16GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.9 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q SERIES Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Citon Q SERIES

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	6x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	2x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	2x
320 Series 300GBIntel $289Bench 46%, 2,154 samples	1x
LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 4,915 samples	1x

RAM
99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 9905471-001.A00LF 9905471-001.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 6 samples	2x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	1x
PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 16GBUnknownBench 39%, 20 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369