HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '17 at 01:20
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 337
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 6.03
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.53
5% 6.85 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.22
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAOA3FD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 95.3
Mixed 29.1
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.41
93% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 68%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
551GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 25.8
Mixed 28.5
36% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback