TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive434% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 23:06
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 855
82% 677 Pts
64-Core 1129
70% 1129 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 89.6%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 128
Parallax 113
96% 120 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 101
Splatting 95.8
89% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 93.8%
 Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3569 4277 3556 1844 1843 1845 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
434% Outstanding
Read 2703
Write 4,018
Mixed 2,853
SusWrite 2,822
702% 3,099 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 104
323% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,358
DQ Write 969
DQ Mixed 1,170
872% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 236% ↑
This bench: 434%
 Great: 508%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
365GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 486 489 488 487 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 478
Mixed 396
SusWrite 487
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 62.5
212% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 368
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 132%
 Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
888GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 488 490 489 487 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 482
Mixed 465
SusWrite 488
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 58.9
198% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 128%
 Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
297GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2185 2169 2192 2195 2186 2196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,698
Write 2,171
Mixed 1,487
SusWrite 2187
479% 2,136 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 85.5
297% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,406
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 1,218
924% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑
This bench: 389%
 Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 39.4
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 130%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING Builds (Compare 2,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples510x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples487x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD  $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples461x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples279x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples223x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $615Bench 204%, 155,335 samples159x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples199x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $103Bench 310%, 455,997 samples167x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples87x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples82x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples70x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples68x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback