TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive456% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 19:15
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 285
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 897
87% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 91.8%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 131
Parallax 114
98% 122 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 102
Splatting 98
90% 111 fps
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 95%
 Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4645 4817 2585 1862 1873 1708 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
456% Outstanding
Read 2,696
Write 4,586
Mixed 2,955
SusWrite 2915
746% 3288 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 111
362% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1480
DQ Write 1,077
DQ Mixed 1,289
960% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 236% ↑
This bench: 456%
 Great: 508%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
338GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 492 494 494 494 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 490
Mixed 416
SusWrite 493
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 65.5
220% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 368
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 136%
 Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
861GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 498 498 497 497 497 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 497
Mixed 471
SusWrite 498
111% 494 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62.8
214% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
270GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1923 1926 1926 1927 1928 1929 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,634
Write 1,934
Mixed 1370
SusWrite 1,926
440% 1,966 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 87.9
311% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,472
DQ Write 1,249
DQ Mixed 1339
1,009% 1,353 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑
This bench: 379%
 Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 38.3
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 38.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 95.1%
 Great: 130%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING Builds (Compare 2,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples510x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples487x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD  $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples461x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples279x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples223x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $615Bench 204%, 155,335 samples159x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples199x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples167x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 276%, 367,854 samples87x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples82x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples70x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples68x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback