HP Pavilion Laptop 14-dv1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 14-dv1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8987
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 19:35
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1155G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 156
2-Core 276
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 615
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 8987) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
9.59% Terrible
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 19.6
Parallax 22
14% 19.7 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane H20 with SSD 512GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 179 109 109 83 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 83%
ST2000LM 007-1R8174 2TB
1TB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 41 42 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 29.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 40.4
44% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 27%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 6.7 7.9 7.3 4.4 5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 6.2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 6.4
9% 6.57 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 24.2
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 17.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 14-dv1xxx Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 14-dv1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback