LG 17Z95P-K.AAE8U1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLG 17Z95P-K.AAE8U1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z95P
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 21:04
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1195G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 256
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 533
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1854 0459) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9836
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 25.1
18% 24.8 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 23
Splatting 16.9
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1136 875 806 773 768 772 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,310
Write 2,337
Mixed 1,662
SusWrite 855
401% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 98.1
324% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,234
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1,079
818% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 295%
Great: 313%
SMI USB DISK 256GB
235GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 74 70 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 90.9
Write 29.9
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 43.2
62% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 7.1
470% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 158%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 57.9
MC Mixed 45.6
139% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 18.4
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17Z95P-K.AAE8U1 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: LG 17Z95P-K.AAE8U1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback