Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 82 40% 62 Pts	4-Core 72.7 8-Core 82 10% 77.3 Pts	64-Core 79.6 5% 79.6 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20.01H20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 21 66 116 113 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 46.7 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 80.1 45% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 66% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 69%
KIOXIA TransMemory 124GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 106GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.5 3.8 4.6 4.6 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	6.07% Terrible	Read 28.1 Write 4.2 Mixed 10 SusWrite 4.5 12% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.07% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	13x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	7x
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	11x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	9x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	45x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	6x
BRAN51288G16C1600L 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 99 samples	6x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $89