Intel NUC11TNBi5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11TNKi5
MotherboardIntel NUC11TNBi5  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 23:29
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 265
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 628
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 8825) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 216
Parallax 208
192% 220 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 157
Splatting 140
134% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 158%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512G-1101 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 601 686 701 694 684 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 676
Write 642
Mixed 635
SusWrite 633
146% 646 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 65
227% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 1,064
724% 884 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 171%
Great: 200%
Kioxia-e XCERIA SSD 500GB
338GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 679 809 829 822 800 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 78%
Toshiba- TR200 480GB
166GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 327 282 161 162 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 371
Write 238
Mixed 294
SusWrite 223
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 24.4
84% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 127
95% 127 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD4AGSA8M-32N220A 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 27.7
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 18.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC11TNBi5 Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC11TNBi5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback