Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 94.4 2-Core 173 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 417 44% 355 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6390) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	108% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 156 Parallax 147 116% 148 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 150 Splatting 103 98% 122 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 569GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 340 381 417 419 409 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 433 Write 423 Mixed 411 SusWrite 372 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 41.9 133% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 362 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 42GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 173 100 102 100 103 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.4% Good	Read 243 Write 230 Mixed 224 SusWrite 122 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 33.5 110% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 35GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 285 296 298 299 298 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 434 Write 430 Mixed 383 SusWrite 291 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 41 131% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 360 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8313 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 13.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	39x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	34x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 4x4GBElpidaBench 55%, 449 samples	7x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	7x
99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 8,083 samples	6x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16