Fujitsu CELSIUS W510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory	6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '22 at 08:10
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31220-$305 2,507 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 164 61% 104 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 290 37% 279 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.6% Average	Lighting 56.6 Reflection 66.1 Parallax 59.7 46% 60.8 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 58.8 Splatting 52 48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 356 Write 276 Mixed 67.2 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 9.9 37% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 17.2 15% 22 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 56%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 510GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 118 124 123 123 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 119 Write 121 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 117 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.8% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W510 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W510

CPU
Xeon E31220Intel $305Bench 68%, 2,507 samples	12x
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples	11x
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples	9x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	9x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	7x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	6x

SSD
860 Evo 2TBSamsung $255Bench 113%, 44,466 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
S3 250G 250GBSandiskBench 87%, 1,221 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 46%, 5,138 samples	4x
NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 39 samples	4x
M391B5273DH0-YK0 Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 M391B5273DH0-YK0 Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 16GBSamsungBench 48%, 7 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $560

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16