Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4 (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '22 at 18:29
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-12100F-$80 11,860 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Memory 78.9 1-Core 174 2-Core 322 102% 192 Pts	4-Core 617 8-Core 850 93% 733 Pts	64-Core 850 53% 850 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44% Average	Lighting 57.5 Reflection 57.4 Parallax 49.5 47% 54.8 fps	MRender 43.1 Gravity 51.7 Splatting 46 38% 46.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 331GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 445 451 471 403 346 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 453 Mixed 427 SusWrite 424 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 53.1 199% 75.4 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 344 258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 130%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 150GB free Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 106 163 145 147 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 432 Write 355 Mixed 313 SusWrite 177 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 17.4 68% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 95.9 DQ Mixed 44.6 50% 86.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GB 1,573 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 29.5 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 34 SC Mixed 26.4 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-E D4 Builds (Compare 1,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $133Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	386x
Core i5-12400Intel $158Bench 98%, 17,352 samples	83x
Core i5-12600KIntel $175Bench 109%, 101,563 samples	77x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	139x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	120x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	78x

SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	55x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	49x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $75Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	49x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	73x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	36x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $416

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16