Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '22 at 11:19
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 154 2-Core 308 102% 186 Pts	4-Core 616 8-Core 1,228 109% 922 Pts	64-Core 1,225 76% 1,225 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 8690) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.8% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 107 Parallax 111 94% 111 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 99.5 Splatting 93.1 88% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2050 657 619 617 621 619 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	343% Outstanding	Read 2,600 Write 2,374 Mixed 1,585 SusWrite 864 414% 1,856 MB/s	4K Read 73.6 4K Write 213 4K Mixed 103 356% 130 MB/s	DQ Read 1,805 DQ Write 1,635 DQ Mixed 1,646 1,255% 1,695 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 343% Great: 340%
Intel(r) RST RAID0 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 256% 526GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 1509 1219 1225 1224 1226 1229 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	260% Outstanding	Read 1,855 Write 1,591 Mixed 1,066 SusWrite 1,272 324% 1,446 MB/s	4K Read 50.2 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 65.5 228% 81.4 MB/s	DQ Read 884 DQ Write 794 DQ Mixed 907 662% 862 MB/s
Poor: 248% ↑ This bench: 260% Great: 262%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x8GB 1,557 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	MC Read 47.9 MC Write 52 MC Mixed 32.8 126% 44.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 52.4 SC Mixed 34.2 105% 36.8 GB/s	Latency 50.1 80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,534x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	838x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	584x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	405x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	352x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	346x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	148x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $633

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16