Intel NUC11PABi5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11PAHi5
MotherboardIntel NUC11PABi5  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 05:33
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 263
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 597
65% 513 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 3004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 24.7
17% 22.3 fps
MRender 18.8
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 16.5
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$79
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1519 1356 1532 1216 222 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,132
Write 1,599
Mixed 1,174
SusWrite 1,001
329% 1,477 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 74.5
248% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 602
498% 719 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 258%
Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FR 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 25.2
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 17
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC11PABi5 Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC11PABi5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback