HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory44.5 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 13:02
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 160
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 565
53% 438 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000
HP(103C 076F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 5.2GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 19.9
13% 19.7 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 21.3
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 166 206 192 217 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.6% Above average
Read 233
Write 222
Mixed 195
SusWrite 198
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 27.5
87% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 166
128% 175 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
3TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 36 161 161 162 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 154
Write 134
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 115
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 BA 69002019-I01-NTA-T ID:01 BA 69002019-I01-NTA-T ID:01 BA 69002019-I01-NTA-T ID:01 BA 69002019-I01-NTA-T ID:01 BA 69002019-I01-NTA-T ID:01 BA 69002019-I01-NTA-T ID:01 BA 69002019-I01-NTA-T JE... 82GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 17.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback