AZW S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAZW S3  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW S3
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 18:53
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 221
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 495
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 18.2
11% 13.8 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 10.3
10% 12 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 859 856 835 632 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,398
Write 926
Mixed 866
SusWrite 683
216% 968 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 65.6
230% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 766
DQ Mixed 341
318% 478 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 193%
Great: 209%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
415GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 436 429 452 461 462 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 459
Mixed 396
SusWrite 442
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 51.4
172% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 249
187% 249 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 27.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S3 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: AZW S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback