Lenovo 90AU000QTX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90AU000QTX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 12:36
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 221
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 573
60% 479 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Zotac(19DA 9454) 2GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.72
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 42
Parallax 34
27% 36.4 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 24.4
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 64 87 75 79 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 91.8
Write 51.6
Mixed 34
SusWrite 76.2
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
417GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 93 100 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 98.9
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 Kingston K531R8-HYA 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AU000QTX Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90AU000QTX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback