Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '17 at 18:06
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 64.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
78% 146 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 848
81% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,385
86% 1,385 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 110
Parallax 93.8
90% 105 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 98.4
Splatting 99.6
80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,655
Write 1,708
Mixed 1,541
366% 1,635 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 25.3
105% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 50.7
44% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 205%
Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
64GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 499
Write 346
Mixed 357
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 16.3
78% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 37
DQ Mixed 38
27% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 126%
Winkom S8240 240GB
24GB free
Firmware: 2.54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 477
Write 198
Mixed 241
67% 305 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 16.3
68% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 34.7
DQ Mixed 9.44
12% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 164
Mixed 162
125% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.19
80% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
255GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 134
Write 163
Mixed 145
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 5.27
4K Mixed 0.99
245% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
255GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 127
Write 152
Mixed 140
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 5.36
4K Mixed 0.69
211% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
112% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 40.7
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 21.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 112%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $832
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback