LG S425-G.BC31P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG S425-G.BC31P1  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta LG2
Memory0.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111213
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 00:34
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 151
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 344
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1854 0896) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2538
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 164 275 25 315 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 392
Write 12.3
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 171
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 17.2
40% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 29.7
78% 159 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 100 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 48.5
Write 69
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 102
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
162% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston termiter5.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S425-G.BC31P1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: LG S425-G.BC31P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback