Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5800-$58 8,890 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	36.4% Below average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 38.4 2-Core 93.5 38% 62.6 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 101 14% 100 Pts	64-Core 94.5 6% 94.5 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset 6,554 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0251) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.57 fps	MRender 0.6 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.1 1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S512G1001 512GB 341 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 444GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3551001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 127 150 111 88 89 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.1% Below average	Read 198 Write 157 Mixed 100 SusWrite 118 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 11.9 52% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.4 DQ Write 44.1 DQ Mixed 14.1 16% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.6 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5800Intel $58Bench 37%, 8,890 samples	2x
Pentium E6700Intel $199Bench 40%, 5,273 samples	2x

GPU
G45/G43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 6,554 samples	3x
Radeon HD 7570AMDBench 5%, 12,360 samples	1x

SSD
SD7SN6S512G1001 512GBSandiskBench 72%, 341 samples	1x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $58