To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 12:57
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Memory 41.7
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 44.8
27% 40 Pts
4-Core 58
8-Core 59.9
8% 59 Pts
64-Core 64.5
4% 64.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Nvidia(10DE 809F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 9.1
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 10
Splatting 9.9
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$22
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 43 52 33 64 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 81.3
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 46.1
38% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.84% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,675 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 58%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback