HP p7-1010t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1010t  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A8C
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110707
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 05:39
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 63.1
43% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 88.5
8-Core 77.4
11% 82.9 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Device(1B0A 9096) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2501.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3
Parallax 2
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0813A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 166 21 11 9.8 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 224
Write 89.1
Mixed 188
SusWrite 77.5
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 16.8
67% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 84.9
DQ Mixed 24.4
28% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64C0MHHHJ-HS 64C0MHHHJ-HS 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.5
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback