Dell XPS 15 9560

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 15 9560  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05FFDN
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 23:27
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 191
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 544
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 07BE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 8.2
6% 15 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPI256MWR7 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0520A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 613 359 183 133 186 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,447
Write 740
Mixed 713
SusWrite 275
175% 794 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 15.1
175% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 290
276% 420 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 145%
Great: 165%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 128GB
52GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 101 101 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 276
Write 511
Mixed 338
SusWrite 162
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 14.8
71% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 98.7
DQ Mixed 54.6
55% 89 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 15 9560 Builds (Compare 4,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 15 9560 - $1,300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback