Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 17:58
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 229
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 454
61% 455 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 863D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 37.6
29% 37.7 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 27
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 19.6
11% 24.1 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 12.5
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 132 35 21 86 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 480
Write 395
Mixed 342
SusWrite 98.5
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 32.5
131% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 138
151% 251 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 90%
Maxtor 7L300S0 300GB-$42
273GB free
Firmware: BANC1G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 58.1
Write 61.2
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 57.2
39% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.3
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 35%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
185GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 57.1
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 56.7
39% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 191 183 187 182 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 114
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 182
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
417GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 91.4
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 85.4
61% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 69%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
49GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 27.2
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 35.9
40% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 22%
SAMSUNG HD753LJ 750GB
10GB free, PID 0951
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 35.7
Write 29.9
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 33.7
43% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 23%
Hitachi HDT725050VLAT80 500GB
138GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 23.8
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 15.1
29% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 16%
WDC WD20 00JB-00GVA0 200GB
50GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.4% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 23.9
Mixed 21
SusWrite 15.1
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 29.8
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback