IBM 1867J13

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIBM 1867J13  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 1867J13
Memory1 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 16:39
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.50GHz
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 53.4
1-Core 14.7
2-Core 14.3
23% 27.5 Pts
4-Core 14.9
8-Core 15
2% 14.9 Pts
64-Core 14.8
1% 14.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTC426060G9AT00 60GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00P3A0L2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 17 18 19 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 19.5
Write 11
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 17.5
11% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.71% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.71%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback