TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 25256LK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemIBM 25256LK  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 25256LK
Memory0.6 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 16:03
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.50GHz
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 43.6
1-Core 14.3
2-Core 14.2
19% 24 Pts
4-Core 14.5
8-Core 14.7
2% 14.6 Pts
64-Core 14.3
1% 14.3 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 22.8%
 Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk P4 8GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SSD 8.13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.9
Write 19.4
Mixed 5.6
3% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 4.4
15% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
7.21% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 7.21%
 Great: 15%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback