Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-600
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 06:06
Run Duration415 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$102
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 696
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.15019.1005
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.7% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 57
Parallax 71.1
46% 61.5 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 40.5
42% 53.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$37
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 126 126 129 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 28.9
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 128
61% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
111% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 112 112 110 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 102
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 110
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 67%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
19GB free, PID a83a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Read 13.4
Write 7.2
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 11.5
15% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 33%
SDHC Card 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 28.5
Mixed 24
SusWrite 28.9
37% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.2
213% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 8502 2400 C16 Series 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 23.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback