Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_X509FA

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_X509FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FAC
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210505
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '22 at 12:00
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	87%
CPU Throttled	80%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 63.6 1-Core 55.2 2-Core 80.6 43% 66.5 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 183 18% 149 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1B12) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.43% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 6.6 5% 5.47 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 10.9 7% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.43% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB 738 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0SA6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 249 280 249 281 282 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 627 Write 295 Mixed 316 SusWrite 261 83% 375 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 25.5 93% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 238 176% 230 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 193%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 7.2 11 7.8 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	5.22% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 6.7 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 9 14% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 20% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.22% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 04CD F4-3200C22-8GRS 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2667, 3200 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 18.3 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13.4 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_X509FA Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_X509FA

CPU
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	95x
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	14x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	109x

SSD
OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GBKingstonBench 116%, 738 samples	38x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	22x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	5x

RAM
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 9,575 samples	50x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Samsung M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GBHynixBench 65%, 50 samples	14x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 66%, 25 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16