Hasee W65KJ1_KK1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHasee W65KJ1_KK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65KJ1_KK1
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170111
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 17:00
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 187
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 394
52% 389 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 651A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 47.3
Parallax 37.9
32% 41.4 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 26.6
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SATA SSD 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 443
Write 283
Mixed 271
73% 332 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 24.1
101% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 92
118% 208 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 92%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
730GB free
Firmware: JA0OA7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 78 64 72 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 70.4
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 72
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-022.A00G 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FA 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 24
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 23.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65KJ1_KK1 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Hasee W65KJ1_KK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback