Intel NUC11PABi7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11PAHi7
MotherboardIntel NUC11PABi7  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 16:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 326
97% 185 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 719
76% 611 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 3004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 29.5
20% 27.4 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 21.1
16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1177 724 370 366 364 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 984
Write 1,162
Mixed 976
SusWrite 562
208% 921 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 60.4
234% 91.3 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 544
DQ Mixed 816
572% 726 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 175%
Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc 8GBU1X08QJLL42-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 30.2
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 21
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC11PABi7 Builds (Compare 436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC11PABi7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 137% - Outstanding Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback