Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '22 at 22:58
Run Duration387 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 95%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$220
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 205
2-Core 405
119% 230 Pts
4-Core 808
8-Core 1,519
139% 1,164 Pts
64-Core 2,401
149% 2,401 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 147
Parallax 145
118% 146 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 128
Splatting 113
109% 137 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 196 195 197 197 198 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66% Good
Read 399
Write 277
Mixed 244
SusWrite 202
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 22.2
84% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 268
200% 271 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66%
Great: 107%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76
153GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1681 1384 1274 1102 947 786 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,525
Write 1,369
Mixed 1,282
SusWrite 1,196
302% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 54.2
178% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,976
DQ Write 1,455
DQ Mixed 925
906% 1,452 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 265%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
240GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 134 136 134 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 134
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 147 151 149 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 147
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74%
Great: 90%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
785GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 83 84 83 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 86.4
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 82.6
102% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 20.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,039
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback