HP h9-1191ea

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP h9-1191ea  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 14:25
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 178
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 503
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Dell(1028 3600) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 182
Parallax 189
136% 180 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 177
Splatting 124
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 141 163 59 102 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 467
Write 382
Mixed 388
SusWrite 164
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 16.5
80% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 29.3
78% 161 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
218GB free
Firmware: MN5OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 104 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 75.4
Write 76.1
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 104
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1191ea Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: HP h9-1191ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback