HP h9-1191ea

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP h9-1191ea  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 02:19
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 97
2-Core 166
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 485
49% 396 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Dell(1028 3600) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 144
Parallax 132
106% 135 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 140
Splatting 98.2
92% 114 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 78 234 14 174 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 478
Write 362
Mixed 394
SusWrite 157
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 18.5
84% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 31.1
77% 156 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
218GB free
Firmware: MN5OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 104 103 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
51% Above average
Read 73.6
Write 78.6
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 104
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.3% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1191ea Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: HP h9-1191ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback