MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 09:42
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 83.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 300
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,146
103% 868 Pts
64-Core 2,222
138% 2,222 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 136
Parallax 240
99% 166 fps
MRender 223
Gravity 122
Splatting 148
132% 164 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 389 392 413 417 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 434
Mixed 301
SusWrite 405
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 33.5
160% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 266
206% 283 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 115%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
25GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 291 289 223 70 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 407
Write 294
Mixed 228
SusWrite 203
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 30.8
102% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 93.4
DQ Write 45.4
DQ Mixed 59.9
47% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 97%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
5GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 457
Mixed 28.8
73% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 19.1
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 0.2
67% 158 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 94 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 97
Write 95.3
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 92.5
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
383GB free
Firmware: MK7ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 102
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 96.1
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 83%
silicon-power 4GB
4GB free, PID 3d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 6.5 5.9 6.2 6.5 5.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Read 26.1
Write 16
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 5.6
15% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 35.1
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 34.2
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback