MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220111
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 23:18
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 307
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,136
103% 865 Pts
64-Core 2,234
138% 2,234 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.1% Very good
Lighting 82.6
Reflection 84
Parallax 228
67% 131 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 122
Splatting 151
99% 116 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 415 410 417 420 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 287
Mixed 256
SusWrite 413
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 37.4
149% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 265
206% 282 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
8GB free
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 412
Write 291
Mixed 227
68% 310 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 31
102% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 91.9
DQ Write 44.6
DQ Mixed 52.1
43% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
5GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 460
Mixed 58.4
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 20.2
104% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 0.2
69% 161 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 89 93 94 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 80.9
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 91.9
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
360GB free
Firmware: MK7ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 94 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 94
Write 99.4
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 95.3
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 83%
silicon-power 4GB
4GB free, PID 3d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5.1 5.3 4.8 5.2 5.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Read 25.4
Write 14.9
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 5
15% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 35.2
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 34.8
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback