Samsung 950XDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive391% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 950XDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT950XDA-X71AW
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210326
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 26 '22 at 01:41
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 156
2-Core 326
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 700
74% 592 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Sanyo(144D C852) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 30.5
23% 26.6 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 20.9
21% 26.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B 512GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7CK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2909 3059 1457 790 824 819 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
391% Outstanding
Read 2,913
Write 3,324
Mixed 2855
SusWrite 1643
604% 2,684 MB/s
4K Read 83.4
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 118
386% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 1,127
865% 1,185 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 391%
Great: 413%
Samsung J3 4TB
582GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 35
Write 28.2
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 17.2
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.4
148% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 73%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB
557GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 25
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 16
32% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 28.3
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 20.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 950XDA Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 950XDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback