Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '22 at 21:09
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 52 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 42.5 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 133 46% 83.5 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 425 40% 332 Pts	64-Core 434 27% 434 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 37.1 29% 37.3 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 26.5 27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 120GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 976 Write 353 Mixed 651 145% 660 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 12.2 38% 9.97 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 68%
Red Hat VirtIO 480GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 273GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 520 606 189 11 3.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 16GB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 512 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 16.1 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.9 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 124%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499