bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory20.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 672 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 17:23
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
CPU #000, 6 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 138
45% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 602
47% 418 Pts
64-Core 1,207
75% 1,207 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 116 104 114 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 389
Write 249
Mixed 299
SusWrite 127
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 8.3
34% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 295
218% 286 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 80%
Vmware Virtual disk 966GB
72GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 112 119 99 82 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 424
Write 325
Mixed 307
SusWrite 111
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 11.5
36% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 266
208% 291 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 72%
Nimble Server Multi-Path Disk Device 2TB
280GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 66 65 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 381
Write 175
Mixed 176
SusWrite 71.3
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 9
31% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 270
228% 336 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 68%
Vmware Virtual disk 5.5TB
396GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 114 106 114 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
Read 390
Write 269
Mixed 324
SusWrite 127
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 13
43% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 258
194% 261 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 49%
Nimble Server Multi-Path Disk Device 3.5TB
940GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 74 73 64 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 318
Write 139
Mixed 180
SusWrite 73
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 8.5
25% 8.7 MB/s
DQ Read 411
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 298
241% 342 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 64%
Vmware Virtual disk 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 115 115 103 113 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 408
Write 264
Mixed 325
SusWrite 127
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 12.1
41% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 256
197% 271 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 62%
Vmware Virtual disk 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 112 108 111 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 476
Write 316
Mixed 312
SusWrite 127
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 13.3
48% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 311
224% 290 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 70%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 116 104 114 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 475
Write 295
Mixed 358
SusWrite 128
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 14.7
48% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 336
257% 352 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 69%
Nimble Server Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
989GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 73 67 65 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 67% Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 128 slots used
128GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 33.7
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback