bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 09:47
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 133
56% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 526
48% 405 Pts
64-Core 895
55% 895 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 269GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 57 58 53 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.6% Good
Read 602
Write 222
Mixed 442
SusWrite 58.7
73% 331 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 26.6
90% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 147
107% 138 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
68GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 53 56 60 48 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62% Good
Read 596
Write 210
Mixed 482
SusWrite 54
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 26.5
92% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 146
109% 144 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62%
Great: 69%
Vmware Virtual disk 3.5TB
420GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 55 59 58 54 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 598
Write 142
Mixed 427
SusWrite 55.5
67% 305 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 25.9
92% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 138
105% 142 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 62%
Vmware Virtual disk 10.5TB
561GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 22 20 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
Read 311
Write 27.2
Mixed 92
SusWrite 20.4
24% 113 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 12.1
39% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 52.7
DQ Mixed 53.4
56% 95.7 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 54 54 41 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 564
Write 201
Mixed 455
SusWrite 51.3
70% 318 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 23.8
79% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 139
107% 146 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57%
Great: 69%
Vmware Virtual disk 9TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 59 47 44 47 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.3% Very poor
Read 84.2
Write 68.7
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 45.6
16% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 8.5
26% 8.13 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 0.2
12% 28.9 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 537GB
116GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 36 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 608
Write 217
Mixed 471
SusWrite 23.3
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 25.8
92% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 150
111% 148 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 95%
Vmware Virtual disk 268GB
223GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 59 60 57 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 556
Write 214
Mixed 404
SusWrite 57.3
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 25.8
89% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 147
104% 131 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 87%
Vmware Virtual disk 537GB
330GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 56 56 49 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 581
Write 184
Mixed 442
SusWrite 54.8
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 24.7
86% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 145
107% 140 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 95%
Vmware Virtual disk 9TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 22 20 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 9% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.9% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 23.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback