bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory17.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 843 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime28.3 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 21:24
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
CPU #000, 10 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 49.9
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 124
49% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 716
57% 502 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 159 170 176 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 445
Write 285
Mixed 324
SusWrite 172
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 12.9
42% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 329
232% 295 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 80%
Vmware Virtual disk 966GB
78GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 341
Mixed 268
66% 305 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 12.5
40% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 272
193% 245 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 72%
Nimble Server Multi-Path Disk Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 138 143 129 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 338
Write 260
Mixed 242
SusWrite 136
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 10.1
26% 8.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 289
225% 310 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 68%
Vmware Virtual disk 5.5TB
563GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 158 172 176 185 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
Read 385
Write 221
Mixed 277
SusWrite 173
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 11
37% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 229
178% 244 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%
Nimble Server Multi-Path Disk Device 3.5TB
953GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 140 143 131 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48% Average
Read 406
Write 204
Mixed 137
SusWrite 137
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 9
32% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 287
219% 298 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48%
Great: 64%
Vmware Virtual disk 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 121 127 128 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 359
Write 277
Mixed 274
SusWrite 127
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 11.9
40% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 280
203% 264 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 62%
Vmware Virtual disk 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 123 131 134 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 386
Write 227
Mixed 308
SusWrite 133
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 12.1
41% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 209
167% 236 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 70%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 159 171 173 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 397
Write 314
Mixed 308
SusWrite 173
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 12
40% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 244
183% 246 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 69%
Nimble Server Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
965GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 141 143 131 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 67% Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 128 slots used
128GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 34.8
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback