bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory113.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 984 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 17:03
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
CPU #000, 16 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 98.6
36% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 595
49% 428 Pts
64-Core 1,540
95% 1,540 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 140GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 138 127 130 126 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 420
Write 321
Mixed 303
SusWrite 141
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 12.5
42% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 294
216% 283 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 82%
Vmware Virtual disk 966GB
900GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 141 127 127 130 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 366
Write 306
Mixed 307
SusWrite 140
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 12.2
40% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 301
212% 266 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 72%
Vmware Virtual disk 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 89 85 88 83 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 385
Write 321
Mixed 301
SusWrite 91.5
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 12.7
42% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 274
190% 239 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 62%
Vmware Virtual disk 5.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 88 83 86 83 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 449
Write 316
Mixed 320
SusWrite 90.2
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 11.4
40% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 315
233% 307 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 56%
Vmware Virtual disk 1TB
722GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 89 89 88 85 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 346
Write 266
Mixed 311
SusWrite 94.4
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 12.4
41% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 299
222% 293 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 70%
Vmware Virtual disk 4.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 85 81 85 82 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 338
Write 258
Mixed 314
SusWrite 89.1
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 10.7
36% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 226
164% 213 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 128 slots used
128GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 23.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback