bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1328 x 386 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime61.4 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 23:24
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 120
38% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 340
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 4.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 186 188 179 173 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 366
Write 236
Mixed 308
SusWrite 171
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 4.4
28% 8.33 MB/s
DQ Read 55.2
DQ Write 63.6
DQ Mixed 54.4
42% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 66%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 98 191 182 179 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 128 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.6
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback