Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100617
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 16:27
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 104
51% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 274
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 63.8
48% 64.9 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 58.2
51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T170810a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 26 28 24 28 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 189
Write 37.3
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 27.6
16% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 17.1
66% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 49.7
DQ Mixed 15.3
17% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 98%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
23GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 54 54 54 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 94.8
Write 97
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 57.7
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 62%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
7GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 79 73 79 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 68
Write 75.3
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 76.8
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 74%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
1GB free, PID 0021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 13.3
9% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback