ECS H110M4-C21

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardECS H110M4-C21  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170629
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 356
49% 362 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 52.2
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 73.9
42% 61.4 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 43.1
43% 53.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte UD PRO 256GB-$49
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 177 216 226 134 223 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 469
Write 427
Mixed 358
SusWrite 193
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 37
135% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 184
180% 287 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
245GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 78 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 71.9
Write 75.8
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 78.7
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ANACOMDA D4 2666 8GB 86D3 SP008GBLFU240B02 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.1% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 23
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 22.9
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M4-C21 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS H110M4-C21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback