Asus 901

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive3.22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus 901  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 901
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20080711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 13:46
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
Socket 478M, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Memory 16.1
1-Core 5.3
2-Core 9.6
8% 10.3 Pts
4-Core 8.5
8-Core 8.8
1% 8.65 Pts
64-Core 8.5
0% 8.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asus-phison SSD 16GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TST2.04P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.4 2.1 6.6 5.6 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Read 22
Write 9.8
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.3
2% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 5%
Asus-phison SSD 4GB
4GB free
Firmware: TST2.04U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.6 3.7 6.9 6.1 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.1
1% 3.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 6%
Single Flash Reader 32GB
3GB free, PID 6335
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7.5 12 12 12 6.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
9.83% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 13
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 9.8
18% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.9
126% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.83%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.09% Terrible
MC Read 1.3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 1.9
5% 1.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 1.5
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 351
11% 351 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback