Acer Aspire A514-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A514-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Lily_TL
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 03:54
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 256
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 438
53% 405 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1468) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 11.5
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 256GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 201 148 126 156 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,472
Write 920
Mixed 880
SusWrite 192
192% 866 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 66
224% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 576
416% 546 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 164%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kllisre Adata 4JQA-0622AC 20GB
2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 18.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 19.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A514-54 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback